<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Injecting JavaScript and CSS into Iframes</title>
	<link>http://matthew.delmarters.com/weblog/injecting-javascript-and-css-into-iframes/</link>
	<description>The Weblog of Matthew Delmarter</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sid Bachtiar</title>
		<link>http://matthew.delmarters.com/weblog/injecting-javascript-and-css-into-iframes/#comment-37787</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid Bachtiar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 08:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://matthew.delmarters.com/weblog/injecting-javascript-and-css-into-iframes/#comment-37787</guid>
		<description>Hi Matt,

One thing that came to my mind is that there already are ways to tell browsers to cache Javascript and CSS files.

Apart from that, I can't think of anything wrong with using this technique. I don't think it exposes any security hole either.

I think similar technique is used with Google maps; using iframe instead of ajax (not sure if injection is used too), because iframe technique allows user to use the back button, unlike usual AJAX stuffs.

Just my 2c</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt,</p>
<p>One thing that came to my mind is that there already are ways to tell browsers to cache Javascript and CSS files.</p>
<p>Apart from that, I can&#8217;t think of anything wrong with using this technique. I don&#8217;t think it exposes any security hole either.</p>
<p>I think similar technique is used with Google maps; using iframe instead of ajax (not sure if injection is used too), because iframe technique allows user to use the back button, unlike usual AJAX stuffs.</p>
<p>Just my 2c</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
